The court and the NZPB must always impose standard conditions but may also impose special conditions on offenders. This topic outlines the available types of special conditions and when they should be recommended. The following topic provides standard wording to be used when recommending special conditions.
Probation officers must take care not to recommend more special conditions than can be managed and monitored during the recommended sentence or order.
If special conditions are considered necessary, the body of the report must clearly outline:
The least restrictive special condition required to mitigate the identified level of risk should be proposed in the report.
Note: Some special conditions are available only in relation to specific sentences/orders.
Detailed guidance on main recommendations in relation to each sentence or order is given in this volume:
Special conditions for offenders released following a sentence of imprisonment (release on conditions or parole) can only be imposed if they are designed to:
Legislative references: Section 93 Sentencing Act 2002, and section 15 Parole Act 2002.
Special conditions for sentences of intensive supervision, home detention (HD), post detention conditions and supervision can only be imposed if the court is satisfied that all of the following apply:
Legislative references: Section 50 and section 52 Sentencing Act 2002.
The legislation defines programmes as:
Legislative references: Section 51, 54H and 93(1) Sentencing Act 2002, and section 16 Parole Act 2002.
Other special conditions that can be imposed include conditions:
Legislative references: Sections 52, 54I and 93(1) Sentencing Act 2002 and section 15 Parole Act 2002.
The standard conditions relating to accommodation require the offender to notify a probation officer of their residential address (in some situations before it changes), and not to live at any address the probation officer has directed them not to reside at (the legislation for the sentence/order under consideration should be checked to confirm the exact wording that applies in any given situation).
These standard conditions provide an adequate level of control to mitigate risk associated with residence in most circumstances.
However, the court or parole board may impose a special condition requiring an offender to reside at a specified address, if this is considered necessary. This may be accompanied by a special condition that allows the probation officer to vary that address – if not; the address can only be varied if an application to vary is approved by the court or parole board.
Reports that recommend home detention HD) or parole with residential restrictions (RR), must include a special condition specifying the approved residential address.
Reports that recommend community detention (CD) must include a special condition specifying the approved curfew address. This is because these sentences/orders have standard conditions requiring them to remain at an address for specified times.
There is special wording that should be used when requesting residential restrictions.
Legislative reference: section 33 Parole Act 2002.
Note: The wording of special conditions relating to residential restrictions is outlined in the following section.
As part of the standard procedures associated with the management of all sentences and orders, probation officers are expected to carry out home visits at the offender’s residential address. In the vast majority of cases offenders accept such visits without complaint.
If there is good reason to believe that the offender will not allow the probation officer access into their residential address, and it is considered that such access is essential, a special condition requiring that access be given to the probation officer as directed may be recommended.
Such a special condition would be imposed rarely, and would normally be requested as a variation to the sentence/order (when evidence of refusal to allow entry, and reasons for the requirement have been established) rather than at the pre-sentence stage.
If such a special condition is considered necessary, the reasons for the recommendation and the nature of access required (e.g. to the property, to all rooms in the property etc.) should be detailed in the report. It is recommended that probation officers discuss these (i.e. proposed special conditions requiring access) with a service manager or senior probation officer before finalising the report.
Note: If HD, CD or Parole with RR is imposed, the offender and the relevant occupants commit an offence if they refuse to allow the probation officer access into the residential/curfew address. It is therefore extremely unlikely that there will be any need for an additional special condition requiring access in these cases.
Legislative references (offence to allow access):
Probation officers must not directly manage the offender’s finances or provide budget advice.
Any condition relating to finances should be managed by referral to an appropriate and recognised (affiliated) budget advisory service.
In the case of an offender who, because of mental or intellectual disability, is unable to manage their own finances, it may be necessary to work with family and health services to facilitate the appointment of a legal guardian or other appropriate person to undertake power of attorney.
A condition of non-association can be imposed as a standard or a special condition and for a variety of reasons. It may apply to:
A condition for prescription medicine can only be imposed if the offender consents, having been fully advised by a person qualified to prescribe that medication, about:
If the offender withdraws their consent, this is not a breach of conditions, but an application for variation should be considered.
Attending a basic work and living skill programme can be applied as a special condition of a sentence/order when it is determined that attendance at such a programme:
Judicial monitoring is imposed, at the time of sentencing, as a special condition of either home detention (HD), or intensive supervision.
Judicial monitoring (JM) is aimed at borderline cases, where the decision to impose a community-based sentence/order in favour of imprisonment is very finely balanced. If a judge considers that an offender may benefit from JM, they will impose this as a special condition.
A similar provision applies to offenders on parole. For details on this see NZPB Progress Monitoring.
It is CPPS policy not to recommend JM as special condition in a pre-sentence report.
Legislative references: Sections 80ZJ to 80ZM Sentencing Act 2002.
Copyright © Department of Corrections | Feedback and queries email: webmaster@corrections.govt.nz