This topic outlines the steps for establishing and evidencing non-compliance with CD.
In order to take legal enforcement action in response to non-compliance, sufficient evidence must be available to satisfy the court that the non-compliance meets the criteria set out in the legislation.
When responding to the non-compliance, the probation officer must establish whether the offender is able to provide a reasonable excuse for failing to comply with the requirements of the sentence.
The CPPS staff member should interview the offender in person or via telephone to determine whether the offender has a reasonable excuse.
Where appropriate, the CPPS staff member should also talk to any relevant people such as doctors, police or counsellors to establish and verify details of the non-compliance.
When interviewing the offender regarding non-compliance and possible enforcement action, the CPPS staff member has a legal obligation to advise the offender:
Note: Offenders must not be interviewed during their curfew period; instead they should be instructed to report to the probation officer or senior community work supervisor supervising the CD to discuss their non-compliance.
The probation officer may be required to produce evidence to support any legal enforcement action taken. The following table provides examples of satisfactory evidence.
|
Non-compliance |
Examples of satisfactory evidence |
|
failure to report as directed |
|
|
failure to remain at the curfew address during the curfew period |
the relevant CD EM notification and accompanying participant event history (if applicable) detailing the offender's failure to remain at the curfew address during the curfew period, or failure to be at the curfew address at the start of the curfew period. |
|
failure to comply with an authorised absence |
Note: If necessary and appropriate a programme facilitator/agency or approved sponsor may be called as a witness to such non-compliance |
|
tampering with EM equipment |
|
|
failure to allow authorised probation officer, senior community work supervisor or other person entry to curfew address |
|
|
further offending or suspected domestic violence |
|
|
failure to notify of any change in address |
Offender casenotes detailing home visit by probation officer or senior community work supervisor to establish the offender is no longer residing at the address. |
Note: If the offender pleads not guilty to a breach, then further evidence to substantiate the breach charge, including affidavits prepared by the electronic monitoring company, may be required.
Reference: Vol 3B, Part IV, Chapter 5 Preparing file for Prosecution of Not Guilty Hearings, for information about the types of additional evidence required for defended hearings, including affidavits prepared by the electronic monitoring company.
Specific details of all instances of non-compliance must be recorded in offender casenotes at the time of the non-compliance.
Information recorded should include:
Offender casenotes should also record whether the offender provided an explanation for the non-compliance, and details of any discussion with others, e.g. approved sponsor.
Note: Do not delay updating records. If an offender is subject to police investigation for a serious offence, the police may seek to interview the supervising probation officer/ senior community work supervisor, and/or request access to the offender's file.
Copyright © Department of Corrections | Feedback and queries email: webmaster@corrections.govt.nz