Individual case planning that matches assessed risks/needs to services and case management of detainees which provides appropriate levels and types of support to address those risks/needs, are consistently documented as good practice in the international research and practice literature. However, although no specific features unique to the management of home detainees were cited, with the possible exception of support being provided to families of detainees in their role as co-residents (cited in one report).
Several case managers identified case management practices as critical success factors for successful HD programs, including: an intensive case management approach combining monitoring/supervision with guidance/counselling; an effective case management approach based on one to one personal contact; and ensuring ‘a constructive day’ through work or other activities. Another noted the importance of consistent policy and practice so that everyone is aware of expected standards and boundaries.
Comparison:
All jurisdictions engage in a case planning approach that is documented in policy and procedures documentation, although jurisdictions vary in the extent to which explicit policies and procedures applicable to HD detainees are separately documented or are governed by non-specific case management policies and procedures generally applicable to all offenders on community based supervision (see later section on program administration).
While all jurisdictions apply a case management approach under which the offender’s assessed needs are addressed through participation in specified programs or approved activities, there is some variation in the timing of case planning commencement and review. In NSW, policy documents state that objectives and case plan should be developed at the same time as the suitability assessment report is being prepared for court (which is prior to the HD order being made). In Victoria and NZ this occurs during induction (which occurs on the first day and during the first week of the order respectively), and in SA the case plan must be completed within two weeks of prison release. Jurisdictions also vary in the extent to which policy documentation makes explicit the core matters to be covered in the case plan (see table below).
There is substantial variation in case plan review timing and processes (see second table below). In some jurisdictions there are regular scheduled reviews (eg, monthly in Victoria and 6 monthly in SA).
Features of case planning for persons on HD
|
point at which planning process commences |
core matters covered in plan |
|
|
NSW 1 |
objectives and case plan should be developed at the same time as the suitability assessment for court |
|
|
Vic |
Offender Management Plan (OMP) initiated during the induction, which must be completed on the first day of the order |
|
|
Qld |
initial case management plan done within 21 days of entering custody, reviewed prior to release to HD |
|
|
SA |
HD Management Plan process commences at intake (generally conducted at residence), each detainee to have a case plan within two weeks of release from prison |
|
|
ACT |
preliminary case plan included in the assessment report; documented case plan developed within 5 working days of induction, HD Unit Case Managers responsible for actively case managing each detainee immediately following the handing down of a HD order by the Court |
|
|
NT 2 |
Client Profile and written Case Plan should be finalised within 6 weeks of first client contact |
goals, objectives, tasks, timeframes and responsibility for the task, based on client profile action/priority target areas and target issues/strengths |
|
NZ |
Sentence Plan commenced at third meeting after release (see information provision section above) |
|
Case review for persons on HD
|
features |
frequency |
responsibility |
|
|
NSW |
no scheduled formal review of overall case management plan but case progress is assessed weekly |
weekly case progress assessment |
Home Detention Unit team |
|
Vic |
regular scheduled review of Offender Management Plan |
fortnightly |
Home Detention Manager with the case manager |
|
Qld |
case reviews occur on a regular schedule throughout the sentence and at event-driven points, eg, entry to HD or parole |
6 monthly intervals throughout the sentence |
review team consisting of minimum of supervising officer and Area Manager/ Team Leader |
|
SA |
case discussion on: progress and compliance with the management plan, referral progress/outcomes, any other existing supervision, any change to supervision level, approved passes/nonessential passes, variations, disciplinary action and formal breaches, and any other matters requiring discussion or review |
monthly |
Manager Case Management and Home Detention Case Manager |
|
ACT |
should include discussion of: progress and compliance with the case plan objectives; reassessment of the level of supervision; individual requests; approved passes; variation to schedules etc, disciplinary matters; and other matters requiring review |
no less than fortnightly for category ‘A’ detainees, monthly for category ‘B’, and six weekly for category ‘C’ |
conducted by Case manager and Home Detention Unit Manager |
|
NT 3 |
purpose of file reviews: to make sure all order conditions are being followed up; procedures are being followed and breach action taken when it should be; provide a “fresh” point of view; provide suggestions and advice on other things to try/services to refer to; and provide some back up and support |
case file reviews every 3 months for new officers (of up to 12 months NT experience) and every 6 months for experienced officers |
conducted by peers at the same level or above as determined by the relevant Manager or Assistant Director |
|
NZ |
a review of the management regime is conducted for all home detainees excluding preparole detainees, sex offenders, Offender Warning System (OWS) offenders, and those with a victim registered with the Victim Notification Register |
within four-six weeks of the commencement of the order; threemonthly or eventdriven reviews of progress against the Sentence Plan |
case officer |
1 NSW: taken from Probation and Parole Policy and Procedures Manual, not detailed in specific HD policy.
2 NT: taken from generic Case Management policy, not detailed in specific HD policy.
3 NT: taken from generic Case Management policy, not detailed in specific HD policy.